What killed them?

The skull of Neanderthal, Natural History Museum, London - Ian Bozic/Focus Point
3 months ago

Throughout history, people have often depicted Neanderthals as primitive and lacking in innovation, but growing evidence paints a more nuanced picture of these early hominids. Archaeological findings suggest that Neanderthals were capable of creating a variety of tools and developing complex cultural practices.

One of their notable achievements includes the invention and use of advanced stone tools, sophisticated hand axes, scrapers, and points using a technique known as the Levallois method. This method involved carefully preparing a stone core before striking flakes from it, resulting in tools that were more efficient and versatile.

There is also evidence to suggest they were skilled in using fire. Cooking, which implies a significant understanding of fire management. Some archaeological sites indicate that they used plant-based glues for hafting stone tools to wooden handles, demonstrating knowledge of complex adhesive techniques.

Beyond material inventions, Neanderthals also exhibited signs of symbolic thought. They created personal ornaments from bones, teeth, and shells, and there is evidence of pigment use, possibly for body decoration or other symbolic practices. These findings suggest they were engaged in behaviors that go beyond mere survival, reflecting elements of cultural and social complexity.

Neanderthals were not merely brute survivors but inventive and thoughtful hominids who developed a range of tools, mastered the use of fire, and engaged in symbolic activities, thereby contributing significantly to the narrative of human evolution.

Their extinction remains a topic of considerable debate and study among scientists, where several theories have been proposed to explain why these early humans, who coexisted with modern Homo sapiens for thousands of years, ultimately disappeared.

One of the leading hypotheses suggests that competition with Homo sapiens played a significant role. As anatomically modern humans migrated into Neanderthal territories, the two species likely competed for the same resources and shelter. We the humans may have had certain advantages, such as more advanced tools, social structures, and adaptability, which could have tilted the balance in their favor.

Another theory suggests that climate change could have contributed to the Neanderthals’ demise. The period of their extinction coincides with significant climatic fluctuations, which may have disrupted their habitat and food sources. Unlike modern humans, they might have lacked the adaptive strategies necessary to cope with these environmental changes.

There is also the possibility of interbreeding. Genetic evidence indicates that Neanderthals and early modern humans did interbreed to some extent, as traces of Neanderthal DNA are present in modern human genomes. About 1-3 percent. This genetic blending may have led to the dilution and eventual absorption of Neanderthal populations into the larger Homo sapiens gene pool.

To add to all of that, an outbreak of disease could have played as a major contributing factor. As Homo sapiens moved into Neanderthal regions, they could have introduced pathogens to which Neanderthals had no immunity, leading to devastating epidemics.

In conclusion, the answer to this mystery is most likely: competition, climate change, interbreeding, and disease that led to their extinction.

Latest from Blog